What is the difference between MongoDB and Cassandra?

by

Difference between MongoDB and Cassandra:

  • MongoDB is cross-platform document-oriented database system while Cassandra is high performance distributed database system.
  • MongoDB is written in C++ while Cassandra is written in Java.
  • MongoDB is easy to administer in the case of failure while Cassandra provides high availability with no single point of failure.

MongoDB and Cassandra are both NoSQL databases, but they have some key differences in terms of data model, architecture, and use cases. Here are some points highlighting the differences between MongoDB and Cassandra:

  1. Data Model:
    • MongoDB: MongoDB is a document-oriented database, which means it stores data in JSON-like BSON (Binary JSON) documents. These documents can contain nested arrays and subdocuments, providing flexibility in data modeling.
    • Cassandra: Cassandra is a wide-column store NoSQL database. It organizes data into tables, similar to a relational database, but the structure can vary from row to row.
  2. Schema:
    • MongoDB: MongoDB is schema-free, allowing you to change the structure of your documents on the fly. This flexibility is advantageous for evolving data models.
    • Cassandra: Cassandra has a schema, but it supports dynamic column families, enabling a certain level of flexibility. However, the schema is typically defined for each column family.
  3. Query Language:
    • MongoDB: MongoDB supports rich queries, including range queries, regular expression searches, and more. It uses a query language similar to JSON.
    • Cassandra: Cassandra uses CQL (Cassandra Query Language), which is similar to SQL in syntax. However, some advanced querying features found in relational databases may not be available.
  4. Consistency Model:
    • MongoDB: MongoDB provides tunable consistency, allowing you to choose between strong and eventual consistency based on your application’s requirements.
    • Cassandra: Cassandra is designed to provide eventual consistency, offering high availability and fault tolerance in distributed environments.
  5. Scalability:
    • MongoDB: MongoDB can scale horizontally by adding more servers to a MongoDB cluster. It supports sharding for distributing data across multiple machines.
    • Cassandra: Cassandra is known for its linear scalability. It can handle large amounts of data and traffic by adding more nodes to the cluster.
  6. Use Cases:
    • MongoDB: MongoDB is well-suited for applications with complex data structures, where the flexibility of the document model is beneficial. It is often used for content management systems, catalogs, and real-time big data applications.
    • Cassandra: Cassandra is designed for high write and read throughput and is commonly used in scenarios where scalability and fault tolerance are critical, such as time-series data, sensor data, and other applications with high write-intensive workloads.

In summary, the choice between MongoDB and Cassandra depends on the specific requirements of your application, including the data model, scalability needs, and consistency requirements. MongoDB is a good fit for applications with dynamic schemas and complex data structures, while Cassandra excels in distributed and highly scalable environments with a focus on write-intensive workloads.