String objects are constants. StringBuffer objects are not constants.
In Core Java, the main difference between the String
and StringBuffer
classes lies in their mutability.
- Immutability (String):
- Strings in Java are immutable, meaning their values cannot be changed once they are assigned.
- Any operation that appears to modify a
String
actually creates a newString
object.
Example:
javaString str1 = "Hello";
str1 = str1 + " World"; // This creates a new String object
- Mutability (StringBuffer):
StringBuffer
is mutable, allowing the content of the object to be changed without creating a new object.- This can be more efficient when you need to perform a lot of modifications to a string.
Example:
javaStringBuffer stringBuffer = new StringBuffer("Hello");
stringBuffer.append(" World"); // Modifies the existing StringBuffer object
- Performance:
- Because of the immutability of
String
, concatenating multiple strings using the+
operator can result in the creation of many intermediateString
objects, which can impact performance. StringBuffer
is more efficient for such operations, especially when dealing with a large number of string modifications.
- Because of the immutability of
- Thread Safety:
String
objects are inherently thread-safe because they are immutable. Once created, their values cannot be changed, making them safe for use in a multithreaded environment.StringBuffer
is explicitly designed to be thread-safe. It includes synchronized methods to ensure safe concurrent access.
In summary, if you need an immutable sequence of characters, and the value is not going to change frequently, then String
is the appropriate choice. If you need a mutable sequence of characters or are frequently modifying the content, then StringBuffer
should be used. In modern Java, StringBuilder
is often preferred over StringBuffer
in situations where thread safety is not a concern, as StringBuilder
is not synchronized, providing better performance in single-threaded scenarios.